Phish guitarist Trey Anastasio is one of the most influential
musicians in the jam band scene. He just finished co-producing
Phish's latest album, Farmhouse, due out May 16. The
band is currently
preparing for an upcoming two-night stand at New York's Radio City
Music Hall May 21 and 22 as well as an extensive summer tour in
the U.S. He recently took time out of his busy schedule to speak
with Jambands.com from the band's office in Burlington, VT.
JW: Hypothetically speaking, if someone had played the album
Farmhouse for you in 1988, what do you think your
reaction would
have been?
TA: That's a good question. I think that I would have liked
it in the sense of albums that I actually listen to for pleasure,
Neil Young for example. I don't think that it would have necessarily
been the direction that I wanted the band to go in at the time.
JW: What was the vision at that time?
TA: Well, in 1988 I think I was at Goddard (College), which was
when I was doing that whole Gamehenge thing. I don't think that
there's ever been a time when I was working so hard. I mean, I
was living alone in a little apartment and was working from the
minute I woke up until the minute I went to bed. I was listening
to a lot of Stravinksy and Ravel. I really was only listening
to classical music at the time. Ravel was sort of an impressionist
composer of sorts and it was music where there were sort of flurries
of notes that were big, broad strokes of sound. I was trying to
do a lot of stuff like that: breaking ground in every direction.
I don't think that the power of the simple tune was at the forefront
of my mind at the time.
JW: Well, let's take a song like "Sand" off the new album,
or "First Tube." What was the songwriting process like compared
to writing something like "Foam" or "Squirming Coil?"
TA: Right. Point exactly. "Foam," as an example, was completely
composed on score paper: bass, drums, piano, guitar. Like I said,
I was really in the mindset of writing a kind of music that combined
classical composition with rock and roll energy that wasn't progressive
rock, you know what I mean? When I wrote "First Tube," "Sand" and
"Gotta Jibboo," that was after a couple of years of the four of
us talking about how important it was to us to groove. It had never
been our strong point. If you listen to early tapes, you know,
the groove was the last thing that we thought about. For a couple
of years, starting at the end of '96, we started talking a lot about
how we were going to improve the groove. Finally what I did was
I set up a power trio tour with two musicians that I know who do
nothing but groove: Tony Markelis and Russ Lawton. You know, Tony's
never taken a bass fill in his life. He refuses to. All he thinks
about is groove. So I got them up into the barn and I had them
start grooving. I said, "start to groove in the key of C sharp."
So they would groove. And I told Russ, "I want you to play the
simplest beat that you know on the drums, the beat that you've been
playing since you were twelve years old, the easiest thing you know,"
and he did. And then I said, "Now Tony, join in in the key of..."
whatever and we did one in each of the twelve keys. And then they
left. Then I wrote songs around these grooves and I took what I
thought were the best nine or ten songs written in that style and
brought them over to Phish. So, the songs were written completely
from the concept of groove first. We had to learn new grooves in
Phish and it's probably the first time that you've ever heard Mike
[Gordon] play the same three notes for six straight minutes.
JW: Would you say in some ways that's just as difficult if
not more difficult than learning a Stravinsky-esque composition?
TA: Yes. To me, I think it may be even more difficult. That
is one thing that's kind of changed in my mind, and I'll use Neil
Young as an example again. Near the end of high school and the
beginning of Phish, which started right after high school, that
just wasn't where my interests lay and over the years that's completely
changed. Now I would probably site a few Neil Young albums or maybe
as another example like Joni Mitchell's Blue, which I
was just listening
to last night. I'll use that as an example of one of the greatest
albums ever written and probably one of the few really timeless
albums from the 60's through the aughts or whatever we're in now
(laughs). You know, because it's so personal and so simple and
so direct. It's just direct emotion and it's a really hard thing
to reveal yourself in that kind of a personal way.
JW: Do you think it's ever possible to achieve that sort of
deeply spiritual groove with very complex compositions?
TA: Well, I would like to think that and there are two points
on the new album where I feel like we did so. What happened was
we were doing all that work in composition and theme and variation
and working on all that stuff that we were doing in 1988 and then
we kind of forgot about it. We retained it in our memory, but we
stopped thinking consciously about it. So when you come to a song
like "Dirt" or "First Tube," even though that was intended to be
simply about the groove... "First Tube" for example. You know how
there's that strange rhythmic thing with the melody at the beginning?
That stuff just starts popping out without you even thinking about
it, at which point I'm always really glad that we all did the work
when we were developing. We learned all the jazz tunes and did
all of the stuff that at certain times felt like a waste of time
because we were never going to be a jazz band. But then that harmonic
sense and sense of mature melodies that comes from playing jazz
tunes for instance, hopefully just stays in you and in your ear.
"Dirt" is another example. You know, there's a string quartet in
that whole outro section and it's very heavily composed after the
lyrics stop when the melody starts on the guitar and then it goes
to the bass and Page [McConnell] is doing that piano figure. That
is pretty heavily composed in the same way that "Foam" was, but
it doesn't really sound like it, I don't think, unless you really
listen a little more carefully. There's a theme, you know, the
melody. Like I said, it starts on the guitar and goes to the bass.
There's a counter-theme that the piano plays and the strings also
play. Then there's that whole descending figure and then the melody
comes back to the guitar and then finally comes back an octave up
on the guitar. That stuff was all written out. A lot of if was
charted on paper. I think it's a little bit more hidden now than
it was back then. It was a little bit more obvious back then I
think.
JW: It's clear that on Farmhouse you had a lot
more creative
control. You co-produced it. You wrote a lot of the songs, solo.
How was that different in the recording process? How was the interaction
with the other band members? Was it still a pretty democratic process?
TA: It was. I think that in a funny way, it's not all that different
than what's been going on the whole time. The main difference was
that we started questioning our roles during the last couple of
albums. The Siket Disc, of course, was all improvised,
there are
no overdubs or anything. But on The Story of the Ghost
especially,
we were really questioning each other's roles. I think what we
found was that everybody's hands were tied being who they were.
So, we kind of untied our hands on this one and I had a lot of ideas.
Probably the oddest thing is that there's usually at least one song
by Mike and there isn't on this album. I think it's because he
was working on his film for the last three years. He hasn't written
a song in a few years. He's been really working on his film.
JW: Have any of the other band members been writing any material
that we'll hear any time soon?
TA: I don't know if they have, but I'm certainly encouraging
them to. Fish [Jon Fishman] just started writing a tune and I was
over his house and we were checking it out. It's a great song.
Now that the album has come out and I was kind of spearheading this
one, I kind of am looking to do the exact opposite. Whenever we
finish a project in a certain direction, I want to do that. I'd
really like Mike to write more music. Everybody would. We're always
happy if Page and Fish write some tunes, but there's no real pressure
I think because they don't usually write songs. It's not necessarily
in their nature. If they do it's like a happy bonus, but Mike has
not been writing music and he needs to write more. We would all
love it if he would write more music.
JW: I want to shift gears just a little bit and concentrate
a little more on the live setting. I know that at the end of '96
you implemented the no-analyzing rule concerning your live shows.
How strictly do you adhere to that? Is there really no analyzing
at all?
TA: No, it's not as strict anymore. Last tour it was kind of
like, we still weren't doing a lot of analyzing. You know, we were
just having a great time backstage, but when it needed to come up,
it did. For instance, that song, "Gotta Jibboo," we were learning
someone else's groove. So, that's kind of a hard thing for bass
players and drummers to do if it's not their natural feel and it
just wasn't working in the beginning. We were really unhappy with
it. I remember we played one show right before the last Hampton
show [Providence Civic Center, 12-13-99]. We all came off stage
and we had just played this horrible, non-grooving version of "Gotta
Jibboo" and everyone was steaming around the band room, like gritting
their teeth (laughs). Everybody wanted to say something, but we
were all just kind of storming around, honoring the no-analyzing
rule. Finally, there was just an outburst and everybody started
yelling at the same time, "What the fuck," you know? (laughs).
And, lo and behold, by talking about it, we figured out what was
wrong. Fish wasn't "swinging the ride." That's basically it.
He was playing the ride straight. It's a swung feel, you know?
Imagine if you were playing the drums. Even though the kick drum
is in the same place in the pattern, if you're right handed, it's
like (Trey sings the melody). It's basically the simplest swung
versus straight and he had been playing it straight, but it wasn't
feeling right and his solution had been to kind of play it louder,
you know? He was trying harder, which doesn't work either (laughs).
As soon as he said that, the next time we played it was in Hampton,
it was the first time it was really great and that was right before
we went into the studio. Had we not analyzed it, it may not have
ended up on the album.
JW: Yeah, that was going to be my next question, because certainly
if you weren't analyzing those songs in the live setting, you would
wind up over-analyzing them in the studio. As a producer, isn't
that what you tend to do?
TA: Definitely. The whole goal with this album was to have the
recording process seem just like another show. What we did was
we went into the studio October 11th, the day after the Albany shows.
I think October 10th was the last day of Fall Tour. So we just
set up the gear. Everybody came in and we just kept playing. You
wouldn't have wanted to be in there...
JW: I think I would have wanted to be in there.
TA: (laughs) Oh, it was really fun. It really was just such
a good vibe. Not to overspeak it, but everybody's just getting
along incredibly well right now and they were during the making
of that album. That's why I was saying it's funny. It's like on
the one hand, I had a really heavy role in the making of this album.
It seemed more like the way that Phish really is in terms of the
way that we interacted compared to a couple of the previous albums,
because everybody was just playing their roles. Nobody was threatened.
If you look all the way back to Rift or something, it's
always been
basically the same vibe. Certain people are more prolific. For
example, let's say I was sitting at the board for ten hours doing
a mix with Bryce (Goggin, co-producer) and we were deciding whether
or not the high hat should get erased or something, or should be
overdubbed. If Fish was just sitting in the room, on the couch,
blabbing away in the background, I felt more confident. So, it's
not like his role isn't important. He likes to stay up late, so
he would come hang out at the barn while we were doing a really
late night. I was always really encouraging him to come over. So,
he was not actually producing the album, but still, it wouldn't
have been the same without him.
JW: Would he ever speak up if he had an objection to something?
TA: He would speak up, but it doesn't happen too often.
JW: Did it happen at all with Farmhouse?
TA: Yeah, but I've got a better example of when it happened with
another older album when we didn't listen to him (laughs). It was
actually the time when we learned to listen to him. You know that
song, "If I Could" on Hoist? Well, right at the
end of that, we
got into this conversation in the studio with Paul Fox, our producer
saying to me, "I really think the vocals should come back in again,
because then it's like a pop song." I had this string thing that
I had written out for the outro, where it builds up, you know?
(Trey sings the melody). In my mind, that would just kind of roll
on endlessly for like the next ten minutes (laughs). Then Paul
kind of brought up this point. He said, "It's really a good pop
song, if you bring the vocals back in again." Then he said, "Figure
out a way to bring the vocals back in." So, we came up with that
thing that's on the album, where they sort of come blasting in at
the end. Fish hadn't been around for a couple of days when we recorded
it and then he came walking in and he was just like, "Oh my god!
It sounds like REO Speedwagon!" (Laughs). But we had just spent
days working on this thing, you know, hours of work that he hadn't
seen. So, everybody was like, "Oh, shut up Fish. You always come
walking in here. You're never here when we're recording." (laughs)
So, we didn't listen to him and I didn't hear that album again for
years because I don't usually listen to our albums. So one day
it was on and that part came on and it just sounded so bad to me
and it sounded exactly like REO Speedwagon (laughs). I remembered,
years later that if I had just listened to Fish...It was at that
point that I realized his role in the studio, which is Fish just
kind of runs around being Fish and then after you're kind of near
the end of a mix, you just kind of bring him in the room and let
him stand there and see how he reacts.
JW: Gotta give him credit.
TA: (laughs) Yeah, exactly.
JW: I've noticed that a lot of the tours seem to have certain
themes. You had the funk in '97, the last tour concentrated more
on your solo material and the whole groove thing. Is there any
kind of preparation for the upcoming tour or the Radio City shows?
Are you trying to put an emphasis on something else? Do you even
plan it ahead that far?
TA: Not this time. We all kind of just took off after we made
the album. We just saw each other for the first time a couple of
days ago. I've been playing a lot of acoustic music. That's all
I've been doing. I'm not sure if that's something that will appear
in this tour or not, but I just was talking to Fish this morning
and I played him a bunch of new songs and he's really excited and
I think Page and Mike are as well. That might be a direction that
we would go in over the next year or two.
JW: Will there be any new material unveiled on this tour?
TA: I don't know yet. Probably, I wouldn't be surprised, but
I don't know if there will be or not.
JW: I know in the past, the band has done a lot of improvisational
exercises, dating back to the early '90s. You were even composing
transitions between songs. What's the preparation like going into
shows these days? Is there any of that or is it more of just going
out and letting it happen?
TA: We've been really been just going out and letting it happen.
Like at the New Year's show, as an example, we had nothing planned
at all.
JW: Even the set list?
TA: Oh, no. We haven't planned a set list now for a couple of
years.
JW: Well that's pretty tough compared to a regular show.
I mean, after doing a three-set show the night before, and an afternoon
set to go out and play eight hours straight.
TA: Yeah (laughs). But it worked, at least for me. I mean, we
felt really good about that night. We just felt great about it.
In the past, for a really big show like that we probably would
have tried to do something crazy.
JW: Like a "Harpua" or "Forbin's."
TA: Yeah, like planned out some big thing and we just fought
that urge fully. We just told ourselves was all we were going to
do is hang out backstage and when it's time to go on, we're going
to go on and just play whatever we feel like playing at the time
and not think about it at all. That has been a big learning experience
for us. It's all part of the same thing with the first question
you asked. To me, improvisation is instantaneous composition.
There's a safety in planning. I was talking about that Joni Mitchell
album. When I listen to that album, it's like you so clearly see
who she was and kind of how old she was and what relationship issues
she was going through. It takes guts to just bare your soul in
that way. I think it's the same as just going on stage and just
playing exactly what you want play at any given time. That's who
you are. You know, there's safety in knowing that you've got this
big show planned out that's definitely going to go to a finale and
the best song is going to be last.
JW: Did you plan not to do an encore?
TA: That was just talked about after the show. We came off stage
and we were standing there and Brad (Sands, road manager) came up
and said, "are you guys doing an encore?" And we just look at
each other and said "No, we're not doing one." It just felt over
at that point.
JW: I wanted to go back to what you were saying about spontaneous
composition. Is that something that you try to achieve 100% of
the time? For example, can you envision busting out a thirty-minute
version of "Farmhouse" one night or is there a conscious effort
to keep certain songs short and concise?
TA: There's probably no conscious effort to keep it short and
concise, but that being said, there's a definite feeling that longer
is not necessarily better, by any stretch of the imagination. At
the same time, just taking that New Year's show being the last show
that we played, there were songs that I don't think would normally
go long that did, you know? We did "Rock and Roll" or something
and that was really long and there were some other really big jams,
but that just felt so different, that whole night. There was just
something that felt bigger.
JW: Were you pleased, generally, with the event as a whole
as well as your performance?
TA: Loved it. Loved that night. Loved that weekend and especially
that night, all four of us. It was really a rare moment of full
agreement by all band members.
JW: It was pretty powerful seeing the sunrise. I had goose
bumps.
TA: Wasn't that just incredible? It just was unbelievable.
It really was.
JW: Would you like to return there? Has there been any talk
or any plans to go back?
TA: Not yet, but we would love to do something else like that.
The only other thing we talked about, and this is just a crazy idea
that we wouldn't necessarily do because we have a million ideas
like this, but we did talk about doing a show in an arena somewhere.
What you do is you half-sell it, so it's about half full. Then
you black out all the windows. Everybody comes in Friday night
at regular concert time and we start playing and we play until Sunday
at about 7 O'clock in the morning. So basically, you lose an entire
day. So you go in at night and it's pitch black. We were even
talking about having everybody surrender their watches, you know?
(Laughs) So nobody has any idea what time it is. There would be
food, but we would do weird things like serving the wrong food at
the wrong time. You know, you serve breakfast at like 7 O'clock
on Saturday night, so nobody has any idea what's going on with time.
The reason it would be half full is that the rest of the room would
be decked out with padded places to sit. The other idea we had
was to not tell anyone that this was going to happen, just let them
in for the concert and then start playing. You can leave if you
want, but you can't get back in. That's like the one rule.
JW: So if someone had to work the next day or something they'd
be kind of screwed.
TA: Well, there's a bank of phones, but there's a security guard
next to the phones. You can make one phone call, but the only thing
you can say is, "I'm not going to be there." You can't say anything
else.
JW: No one on the outside world would have any idea what was
going on.
TA: If you really needed to tell somebody, you could say, "I'm
OK, but I'm not going to be there." (laughs) You could say that
if you had to go to work the next morning.
JW: So I guess you'd have to serve a lot of coffee to keep
people awake.
TA: (laughs) Yeah, there'd be coffee and anything anyone needed,
we would have. It would all be in there. It would all be set up.
It would basically be like the indoor version of the New Year's
show, except it would be thirty-six hours.
JW: I'm assuming there would be set breaks.
TA: Well, I don't know. I was pretty beat after eight hours,
but not really. I felt pretty energized. One thing you could do
is, which we didn't get into on New Year's Eve, but we talked about
wanting to get into more, would be that one or two band members
could leave for five or six hours and the other two people could
keep playing.
JW: Like a Fishman drum solo, which of course he doesn't like
to take.
TA: (Laughs) Yeah, well that would have to be his first drum
solo, but it would have to last five hours.
JW: Or you could open the show with "Squirming Coil" and leave
Page on stage to play a piano solo for seven hours (laughs).
TA: No, for thirty-five hours (laughs). We'd just leave him.
You know, he'd do the whole thing.
JW: That's a really interesting idea. I hope it comes to
fruition. Although the tapers would be screwed.
TA: Oh no, we would have tapes and batteries, but actually there
would be like a fishing pole with the tapes, just out of reach (laughs).
JW: Philosophically speaking, do you think it gets harder
as the years go on to come up with original songs, not just for
you, but for any musician? If you take The Beatles for example,
they were geniuses, but pretty much anything they did was going
to be innovative at the time. As more and more bands write more
and more songs over the years, do you think your options start to
get limited?
TA: I find it easier and easier to write music and I'm actually
doing a symphony thing next February, which I've always wanted to
do. It's like a dream come true.
JW: With a full orchestra?
TA: With an orchestra. I'm going to write for the orchestra.
That's like February 4th. Songs don't get easier for me, in terms
of writing lyrics and stuff, but music gets easier in my mind.
I think your life becomes richer, but I guess lyrics have always
been a whole different ball game.
JW: What is the orchestra going to consist of? Are you going
to play an instrument or are you just going to write?
TA: I'm just going to write. It's an eighty-five-piece orchestra.
It's the Vermont Youth Symphony. I think it's February 4th and
5th. It will be in Albany and Burlington. At this point, I'm probably
going to do a completely re-written, orchestrated version of "Guyute,"
which was originally supposed to be like an orchestra piece anyway.
JW: Oh, really?
TA: I mean in my mind.
JW: Kind of a Celtic kind of feel.
TA: Yeah, it's just in that type of form. A lot of that music
that I used to write sounds like that. You know like the stuff
in the middle of "Fluffhead?"
JW: Yeah, I could hear songs like "Divided Sky" or "You Enjoy
Myself" being played by an orchestra as well.
TA: Yeah, because your palette is just so unlimited. Ernie Stires,
who I've worked with for a long time and was sort of my mentor,
is writing a piece for guitar and orchestra for me. So, I'll play
that with the orchestra and then they'll do whatever I come up with.
I'm looking forward to it.
Jeff Waful is the daily news editor for
Jambands.com and manages and books
Uncle Sammy.